|
PCG
special Budget newsletter 2006 - 22 March 2006
IN THIS
ISSUE
-
Budget heralds opportunities for freelance businesses:
the end of IR35?
-
Tax-motivated incorporation
-
Income tax and NICs
-
Reducing administrative burdens in the tax system
-
HMRC – powers and relationship with business
-
Anti-avoidance measures
-
Better regulation
-
Public sector procurement
-
Global economy
-
Transport
-
Small Firms Loan Guarantee
-
Give your verdict on the Budget
Budget heralds opportunities for
freelance businesses: the end of IR35?
Today’s Budget offered many
opportunities that could be advantageous to the UK’s
freelance consultants and contractors. PCG will engage
closely with the Government during the development of
these policies, seeking to ensure that they are
implemented in a positive and constructive manner which
protects and enhances the competitive advantage that
freelancers offer the economy. In particular, PCG will
focus on the review of so-called “disguised employment”
and of income tax and NICs.
“This offers a clear opportunity to
address the unfair and inconsistent intermediaries
legislation, known as IR35, as well as the enormous
complexity of the taxation of freelance consultants and
contractors,” said PCG chairman Simon Juden. “We look
forward to engaging positively with Government on these
issues, as we have long campaigned for consistency,
clarity and common sense in the taxation of freelancers.
Tax-motivated incorporation
The
Budget report refers to employment income being disguised
as dividends by “mass-marketed managed service company
schemes”, which almost certainly means composite
companies. The Government will bring forward proposals for
discussion to consider how, in this context, it can make
sure that everyone pays their fair share of tax and NICs,
irrespective of legal form. This means that the Government
is preparing to attack “disguised employment” via managed
service companies.
It has long been PCG’s stance that if a scheme for
reducing tax bills seems too good to be true, it probably
is. Companies wishing to hire contractors should do so on
proper business-to-business terms; conversely, they should
not be hiring workers as contractors and then forcing them
to work as if they were employees. PCG is therefore very
pleased that the Government will be considering how to
prevent this kind of abuse and will engage fully and
constructively to inform its understanding of this issue.
This review process will inevitably involve looking at
issues surrounding IR35. PCG argued ahead of the Budget
that as a tax measure, IR35 had proved to be a failure.
Its survey of members found that IR35 remained the issue
above all others that members wished to see addressed. The
Government should take this opportunity to remove the
gross complexity and unfairness created by IR35.
The Budget report also stated that some agencies,
contractors and employers have been requiring employees to
adopt corporate form. This echoes issues raised by the
recent Muscat case and PCG reiterates that contractors
should not be hired to work as employees – this
constitutes abuse. By the same token, the Government
should appreciate that many people work as contractors out
of a positive choice, are not forced to incorporate, and
categorically do not want employment rights.
Income tax and NICs
The Budget report specifies that the
possible alignment of income tax and NICs will be directed
at low-paid workers. PCG believes that this consideration
should be extended to aligning the two systems completely.
“This represents an opportunity to remove distinctions
which are meaningless in practice,” said Dr Juden.
Reducing administrative burdens
in the tax system
The results of KPMG’s study of the
administrative burden on business of complying with the
tax system were also announced as part of the Budget
package. The figure of 0.41 per cent of GDP is difficult
to assess, as international comparators are limited.
Nonetheless the Government has set targets for reducing
this burden: a 10 per cent reduction in the costs
associated with forms and returns over five years; and a
reduction of at least 15 per cent over five years in costs
associated with audits and inspections.
Commenting on these targets, Francesca Lagerberg, Chair of
the ICAEW’s Tax Faculty, said, “It’s good to see the
Chancellor setting a benchmark for cost reductions with
these two quite aggressive targets. While it remains to be
seen whether the targets can be met in practice, the fact
that they have been set is broadly welcome.”
Also following on from the KPMG report, the creation of an
independent business-led Administrative Burdens Advisory
Board was announced today. This Board will seek to
identify solutions for the long “tail” of administrative
problems that cause significant difficulties to relatively
small numbers of businesses.
“This new independent body is a welcome announcement:
there remain many problems in the tax system that,
although small, can cause owner-managers of small
businesses a lot of frustration and anger,” said Lagerberg.
“Addressing these issues may not be easy, but it can only
be a good thing that the Government is aware of the
problem and seeking solutions.”
HMRC – powers and relationship
with business
A further review of HMRC’s powers
was announced in today’s Budget, with a consultation
document to be published shortly. This plans to consider
reducing costs for the compliant and creating a more
responsive penalty framework. PCG welcomes the review and
will respond to it. Concerns remain, however, over HMRC’s
increasing use of terms such as “compliance” in an
apparent effort to blur the distinction between avoidance
and evasion of tax; PCG hopes that this exercise will not
result in law-abiding businesses being unfairly targeted
as “non-compliant”.
PCG will also study the latest document derived from the
creation of HMRC last year, Progress towards a new
relationship. As PCG stated before the Budget, a new
relationship between the taxpayer and the tax authority
would certainly be welcome. Its
members’ survey revealed, however, that HMRC’s conduct
towards businesses has become a serious concern and
highlighted a perception that its methods are becoming
increasingly aggressive and invasive.
Anti-avoidance measures
As prefigured in last year’s
Pre-Budget Report, the Budget contains numerous measures
intended to “protect tax revenues”, essentially by
attacking elaborate avoidance schemes used by larger
companies. PCG believes that the Treasury’s continued
focus on avoidance rather than evasion must be questioned.
The Budget report states that HMRC and the Treasury remain
committed to tackling avoidance by using legislation and
litigation in a proportionate and fair manner and while
maintaining the competitiveness of the UK. HMRC’s
spectacular failure rate in IR35 investigations (1,211
successfully defended by PCG’s approved suppliers and only
3 won by HMRC – the only figures available for IR35
success rates) suggests that much of this anti-avoidance
work is neither proportionate nor fair and that it does
not represent good value for money for the taxpayer.
Similarly, HMRC’s continued pursuit of its
reinterpretation of the settlements legislation cannot be
said to be proportionate.
Better regulation
The Budget report sets out the
Government’s five key areas of reform directed at
business: two of these are regulatory reform and
simplification of business tax. These are certainly the
right areas to be looking at, but the concern expressed by
PCG members over the complexity of the tax system in the
pre-Budget survey strongly suggests that the Government
has a lot more work to do before it can be said to have
made any significant progress.
The outline of progress on the Better Regulation Action
Plan presented in the report is a welcome table. In
particular, PCG is pleased to see that the draft Code of
Practice for regulators is to be set on a statutory
footing; we will consider the draft published today and
respond in full in due course.
It must also be observed at this stage that another plank
of the Action Plan, the Legislative and Regulatory Reform
Bill, has attracted much controversy over the potential
for the proposed new Regulatory Reform Orders to bypass
parliamentary scrutiny. PCG expressed concerns over this
at the consultation stage and these concerns remain.
The proposals elsewhere in the report for aligning the
dates on which corporation tax returns are to be filed and
accounts are to be delivered to Companies House strike PCG
as sensible and a potentially useful regulatory gain.
Public sector procurement
The Budget report outlines progress
made in making public sector contracts available to SMEs:
specifically, 59 per cent of local government contracts
went to SMEs in 95 authorities studied for the survey.
There clearly remains, however, a long way to go in terms
of removing the excessively restrictive barriers to SMEs
in tendering for contracts with national government. PCG
maintains that there is a potential role for freelance
contractors and consultants high up supply chains that
could enhance their effectiveness considerably. Currently
this role is unfulfilled.
Global economy
The opportunities presented by a
global economy and the necessity for a vibrant enterprise
culture within the UK are recurring themes within this
year’s Budget. This begs several questions, however, not
least why the Government has committed no resources to
studying the economic impact of offshoring on the UK,
despite encouraging the trend.
Transport
PCG’s pre-Budget survey of members
showed that the UK’s freelance consultants and contractors
would favour an increase in public spending on transport
over any other area. It is disappointing therefore that
the Budget was largely silent on this issue. That said, a
consultation was announced in the report on possible
reforms in the area of capital allowances for cars, which
PCG will monitor. The deferral of the inflation-based
increase in fuel duties to 1 September 2006 will also be
welcome for PCG members.
Small Firms Loan Guarantee
The Budget report states that the
Small Firms Loan Guarantee is to be extended to all
sections of the small business community, which could make
it available to freelance contractors for whom it was
previously inaccessible. PCG will be interested in viewing
the detail of this development as it becomes clearer.
Professional Contractors Group Limited
Sovereign Court
635 Sipson Road
West Drayton
Middlesex
UB7 0JE
Telephone:
+44 (0845) 125 9899
Fax: +44 (0845) 644 4105 |